Connect with us

K-12

Illegal Alien Gets Cali School Named After Him

Published

on

You might remember illegal alien Jose Antonio Vargas from his MTV documentary “White People,” in which he shames people for their lack of melanin, or his frequent sparring with TV hosts like Bill O’Reilly and Tucker Carlson.

At 38 years old, Jose, who was brought across the border when he was a child, is four months too old to qualify for protection under the Dream Act, which of course still hasn’t even passed. He was detained five years ago, but his friends encouraged the Obama administration to set him free.

Now, the Mountain View Whisman School District in California, where Jose was taught, is naming a school after the illegal, according to The Washington Post.

As I mentioned, Jose didn’t come to America of his own free will. But I give him such a hard time because not only did he stay in the country after he found out he was illegal, but he’s also one of the guys who’s using language as a weapon to beat the country’s native population. His group, Define American, successfully campaigned Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, NBC, the Associated Press, and others into using “undocumented” instead of “illegal,” reported The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Undocumented immigrant” doesn’t seem to have been enough for Jose, whose 2018 memoir was entitled “Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen.”

You know, because that’s a thing. Now, you might be wondering why Jose hasn’t gotten the boot, but another good question is: how is he able to earn a living in America? In addition to MTV, Jose has done work for The Washington Post, CNN, the New York Times, the list goes on. I reported a couple years ago that he seems to be using a legal loophole in limited liability company, or LLC law to contract with various companies.

Specifically, companies that contract Jose appear to be violating US Code 1324A: Unlawful employment of aliens, as long as they know Jose is an illegal alien when they contract with him. Given that much of Jose’s work is about his status as an illegal alien, it would be kind of hard to believe they’re ignorant of that little fact.

K-12

Teacher Fired After Reporting Illegal Students To Trump

Published

on

The board of Fort Worth Independent School District voted unanimously to end the contract of Georgia Clark, who’s worked for the Texas district for two decades, reported The Washington Post.

What was the teacher’s crime? Well, Georgia sent tweets to Trump saying “anything you can do to remove the illegals from Fort Worth would be greatly appreciated.” She said “I do not know where to turn” and that “Texas will not protect whistle blowers. The Mexicans refuse to honor our flag.”

Now, she should have said illegal Mexicans there, but other than that, Georgia’s tweets don’t seem to have been racially charged, but rather, legally charged…it looks like she wants to make sure that children who attend schools are from tax-paying families that didn’t cut in line to enter America. I mean, she did apparently have some awkward interactions with students like telling one who asked to use the bathroom to show papers proving the student was legal.

However, Georgia probably wasn’t aware of the Supreme Court’s 1982 Plyler v. Doe decision, which requires public schools to teach children, even if they aren’t supposed to be in the country. Now, I’m not seeing anywhere that the decision expressly forbids schools from asking for students’ immigration status or reporting them to ICE, but legal guidance issued under the Obama administration tells schools that they can’t require students to prove that they’re citizens.

Trump’s Education Department has scrapped race-based admission guidelines and has moved to change the “guilty until proven innocent” mindset that too often prevails in campus sexual assault trials. So if you’re watching, Orange Man, it’s time to take care of the immigration stuff too, both in school and with the border wall.

Continue Reading

K-12

Maine BANS Native American Mascots in Public Schools

Published

on

Maine Democrat Governor Janet Mills recently signed a law that will prevent any public schools from having Native American mascots, reported WGME. Janet said “A mascot is a symbol of pride, but it is not the source of pride.” “Our people, communities and understanding and respect for one another are Maine’s source of pride, and it is time our symbols reflect that.”

I don’t understand, so you want understanding and respect to be school mascots? Those would be just a bit tougher than a powerful chief to visually represent, don’t you think? The governor also said “we have heard clearly and unequivocally from Maine tribes that [the mascots] are a source of pain and anguish.”

When I’m editing pieces my correspondents write over at Campus Reform, I always say that every factual claim needs to be sourced, so I’d really like to see a link here. I haven’t seen polls of Maine Native Americans in particular, but I remember this one Washington Post survey showing that 90% of Native Americans weren’t offended by the Washington Redskins.

I did see some indication that younger people were more in favor of these kinds of name and mascot changes but, let’s be honest, opinions from people my age aren’t often proof of any kind of novel thought so much as indoctrination. And when indoctrination doesn’t work, some professors resort to more aggressive techniques.

Remember San Diego State lecturer Oscar Monge? The California DOJ found the Native American lecturer guilty of racial discrimination, harassment, and retaliation after he called a white student who wore braided hair and a shirt with the school mascot racist and guilty of cultural appropriation, threatening to lower her grade after she disagreed with him in a mascot debate. Something tells me this new Maine law is gonna lead to a lot more of that.

Continue Reading

K-12

SAT’s New ‘Adversity Score’ Sounds Like A Load Of BS

Published

on

It used to be the case that doing well on your SAT meant something. While different schools had different grading scales and different opportunities for sports, honor societies, etc., the SAT was a number you could use to measure roughly how good people from all across the country are at math, reading, and writing.

But the SAT is planning to introduce a new “adversity score” that is calculated with a 1-100 scale, according to The Wall Street Journal. SAT maker the College Board also refers to it as the “overall disadvantage level” and it includes 15 factors like crime and poverty in the neighborhood, single-parent and English as a second language in the family category, and then high schools factors like how hard the curriculum is and the free lunch rate.

Now this is all happening suspiciously close to a Supreme Court decision on affirmative action between Harvard University and a group representing Asian American students. I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but it’s almost like there are some malicious puppet masters behind the scene saying “hey just on the off chance the Supreme Court outlaws affirmative action, we better make sure we’ve already embedded it into one of the quantitative, objective admission metrics.”

Indeed, Anthony Carnevale of Georgetown, who used to work for the SAT’s maker, the College Board, said “the purpose is to get to race without using race.”

Western culture is predicated on achievement. Sure, it’s nice that you tried hard, but the men who make the history books — and women, and women — don’t do so because of their effort, but rather the observable, quantifiable results of that effort. S-A-T? More like S-A-D. Sorry, just had to throw in a boomer joke.

Continue Reading

Trending

%d bloggers like this: